Comparison of the curative effect of bi-level positive airway pressure and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2016.06.006
- VernacularTitle:双水平气道正压通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效比较
- Author:
Yijia FAN
;
Guifeng CHEN
;
Yiqun TENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Respiratory distress syndrome;
Ventilation,artificial;
Infant,newborn
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2016;23(6):822-825
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical application effect of bi -level positive airway pressure ( BiPAP) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ( CPAP) in the treatment of preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome ( NRDS) .Methods 64 neonates with NRDS were divided into the BiPAP group ( n=35) and NCPAP group (n=29) according to the randomized controlled study method.The blood gas index before and after 2,12 hours of treatment,the total time for ventilation,length of stay,and the incidence rate of abdominal disten-sion,gastroesophageal reflux,bronchopulmonary dysplasia,intraventricular hemorrhage,ventilator-associated pneumo-nia in the two groups were compared.Results The levels of pH and PaO2 in the BiPAP group were higher than those in the NCPAP group in noninvasive respiratory support for 2,12h(t=2.391,2.556,2403,2.355,P=0.020,0.013, 0.019,0.022).The incidence rates of hypoxemia,apnea,re-intubation mechanical ventilation rate after 12h in the BiPAP group were lower than those in the NCPAP group(t=5.049,4.988,4.215,P=0.025,0.026,0.040).The length of stay and mechanical ventilation time in the BiPAP group were shorter than those in the NCPAP group( t=-2.096,-2.669,P=0.041,0.010).Conclusion Compared with NCPAP,early application of BiPAP can obviously reduce the invasive respiratory support rate of children with NRDS with intubation.It is worthy of promotion.
