Short term effect of brachypodium total hip arthroplasty for young patients with osteonecrosis
10.3760/cma.j.jssn.1673-4904.2016.03.009
- VernacularTitle:陶瓷对陶瓷短柄全髋关节置换术治疗中青年股骨头坏死的临床疗效
- Author:
Yuxi WEI
;
Beibei FU
;
Quanbing WANG
;
Hong CAO
;
Haibing ZOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hip;
Replacement;
Osteonecrosis;
Ceramics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2016;39(3):220-223
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate short term effect of brachypodium total hip arthroplasty for young patients with osteonecrosis, and to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods From January 2008 to January 2012, 44 cases of femoral head necrosis patients (46 hips) were selected, with age from 28 to 52, and average age (39.94 ± 5.25) years old; according to prosthesis type they were divided into control group and observation group, control group( 22 cases of 24 hips, using metal-on-polyethylene Duraloc total hip prosthesis replacement treatment), and in the observation group (22 cases of 22 hips, with use of ceramic-on-ceramic Metha Brachypodium total hip prosthesis replacement therapy). Patients were followed up for 12 to 36 months, Harris score, range of motion and other indicators were compared in two groups of patients. Results In observation group and control group, the level of WOMAC score, total Harris score and function, motion range, pain, abnormalities score were significantly improved compared with those before operation:in observation group:(27.46 ± 4.19) scores vs.(66.38 ± 5.84) scores, (92.73 ± 7.68) scores vs.(42.67 ± 7.28) scores, (45.28 ± 5.34) scores vs. (22.19 ± 4.19) scores, (4.46 ± 0.63) scores vs. (3.25 ± 0.66) scores, (39.54 ± 1.54) scores vs. (15.39 ± 2.86) scores, (3.45 ± 0.65) scores vs. (1.84 ± 0.32) scores;in control group:(28.16 ± 4.07) scores vs. (65.67 ± 6.22) scores, (93.03 ± 7.54) scores vs.(43.74 ± 7.57) scores, (44.65 ± 5.26) scores vs. (22.45 ± 4.37) scores, (4.74 ± 0.71) scores vs. (3.17 ± 0.59) scores, (39.87 ± 1.26) scores vs. (16.19 ± 2.55) scores, (3.77 ± 0.73) scores vs. (1.93 ± 0.43) scores, and there were significantly differences (P<0.05). There were no significantly differences between two groups (P>0.05). All patients were follower up for 12-36(23.19 ± 3.66) months. One case in observation group had leg swelling and healed after symptomatic treatment, 1 case in the control group had limb swelling, and 1 case had extensive subcutaneous bleeding .And they were cured after symptomatic treatment 1 case had femoral dislocation, and no secondary dislocation happened after the implementation of manual reduction. Conclusions Brachypodium ceramic ceramic total hip replacement therapy has same effect for young osteonecrosis patients compared to polyethylene and metal prosthesis in improving hip function, but the ceramic-on-ceramic prosthesis brachypodium has better performance in wear resistance with smaller friction coefficient is smaller, and is suitable for young patients.
