Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulant alone for treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a Meta-analysis of randomized trials
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2015.12.004
- VernacularTitle:导管直接溶栓联合抗凝与单纯抗凝治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成疗效Meta分析
- Author:
Sheng GUAN
;
Qingbo FANG
;
Hongbo CI
;
Xiaohu GE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Venous thrombosis/Treatment;
Thrombolytic;
Anticoagulation;
Meta-analysis;
Systematic review
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2015;42(12):803-807
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) combined with anticoagulant compared with traditional treatment (Anticoagulant alone A C) for deep venous thrombosis.Methods We searched Medline,Embase,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,PubMed,Chinese Biomedical Literature Data Base (CBM),Chinese Scientific Journal,Full-text Data Base (CSJD),and,added with hand searcing and other retrievals.The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0.18 was used for Meta-analysis.Results Four randomized controlled trials were available and were included in the study.Meta-analysis showed that 6 months after treatment,iliofemoral vein patency rate of CDT group was higher than that of AC group (OR =5.13,95％ CI:2.01-13.14,P =0.0006);Major complications of CDT group compared to those of AC group were not statistically significant(OR =2.74,95％ CI:0.76-8.07,P =0.13),but the minor complications and total complications of CDT group were higher than those of AC group [(OR =7.86,95％ CI:3.10-19.90,P ＜0.0001)and(OR=5.42,95％CI:1.47-20.01,P=0.01)].Conclusions CDT is a positively effective way to treat early DVT.Application of CDT in patients without contraindications to its use can have good therapeuic effect.
