A randomized controlled study of water exchange colonoscopy and air insufflation colonoscopy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2015.10.003
- VernacularTitle:水交换结肠镜与注气式结肠镜检查的对比研究
- Author:
Xiaolin CHEN
;
Jun LIU
;
Hongyu REN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Colonoscopy;
Polyp detection rate;
Water exchange colonoscopy;
Air immersion colonoscopy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2015;32(10):659-662
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical application prospect of water exchange colonoscopy.Methods A total of 300 outpatients who underwent unsedated colonoscopy were randomized to the WEC group (n =150)or the AIC group(n =150).The maximum pain score, insertion time, the cecal intubation rate and the polyp detection rate were reported by an assistant during the insertion phase and at the end of colonoscopy.Results The maximum abdominal pain scores were 1.77 ± 1.29 in the WEC group and 2.84 ± 1.55 in the AIC group with significant difference (P =0.000).The intubation time of WEC was longer than that of AIC (11.91 ± 3.58 VS 8.03 ± 3.19 ,P =0.000)with no significant difference.There was no significant difference in the cecal access rate between the two groups(97.3％ VS 94.0％ ,P =0.157).The polyp detection of WEC was higher than that of AIC (16.7％ VS 10.0％, P =0.089).In the post abdominal operation subject of colonoscopy procedure, WEC had higher rate of cecal intubation than AIC ,the maximum abdominal pain score were 2.25 ± 1.63 in the WEC group,lower than 3.48 ± 1.45 in the AIC group.Conclusion Water exchange colonoscopy can alleviate patients' abdominal pain symptoms, but with longer insertion time.There are no significant difference in the cecal access rate and the polyp detection rate between two groups.For difficult colonoscopy, water exchange colonoscopy is helpful to increase the rate of cecal intubation.
