Efficacy of conventional treatment combined with flupentixol and melitracen in reflux esophagitis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2015.12.003
- VernacularTitle:常规治疗联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛对反流性食管炎的疗效
- Author:
Lifeng QIN
;
Jiqiao ZHANG
;
Xiaohui ZHENG
;
Jingjing WANG
;
Xiaoping LYU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Antianxiety;
Antidepressant;
Esophagitis,peptic;
Combined treatment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2015;35(12):811-815
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of conventional treatment combined with flupentixol and melitracen in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE).Methods From June 2012 to March 2015, a total of 182 patients were selected as study subjects from newly diagnosed RE patients.The anxiety and depression scores were evaluated according to Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD).And then patients were divided into HAMA and HAMD negative conventional treatment group and combined treatment group, HAMA and HAMD positive conventional treatment group and combined treatment group.Rabeprazole and mosapride were administrated in conventional treatment group.For patients in combined treatment group, on the base of conventional treatment flupentixol and melitracen were added.The treatment course was eight weeks.The degree of anxiety and depression, RE symptoms and mucosal healing under gastroscope were evaluated before and after treatment.Adverse drug reaction was observed.Chi square test or t test was performed for statistical analysis.Results Eight weeks after treatment, the scores of HAMA and HAMD in HAMA and HAMD positive combined treatment group were 7.930 ±3.832 and 9.630 ± 3.650, which were both lower than those of conventional treatment group (11.660 ± 4.108 and 12.170 ± 4.459), and the differences were statistically significant (t=3.683 and 2.233;both P＜0.05).The symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain of HAMA and HAMD positive combined treatment group were 0.700±0.591,0.780± 0.629 and 0.720±0.621, respectively, which were lower than those of conventional treatment group (1.280 ± 0.502, 1.370 ± 0.610 and 1.040 ± 0.842), and the differences were statistically significant (t =5.133, 4.413 and 2.114, all P＜0.05).There were no statistical significance in symptoms scores between HAMA and HAMD negative combined treatment group and conventional treatment group (all P＞0.05).After treatment, the mucosal healing rate of HAMA and HAMD positive combined treatment group was 91.3％ (42/46), which was higher than that of conventional treatment group (71.7 ％, 33/46), and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =5.845, P =0.016).The incidence of adverse events of HAMA and HAMD negative combined treatment group was 4.8％ (2/42), and that of HAMA and HAMD positive combined treatment group was 2.2％(1/46).Conclusions The conventional treatment combined with flupentixol and melitracen in RE patients accompanied with anxiety and depression was remarkable and safe.RE patients without obvious anxiety or depression, preventive use of antianxiety and antidepressant medicine can not improve the efficacy.
