Sirolimus versus Tacrolimus as primary immunosuppressant after renal transplantation: A meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.12.008
- VernacularTitle:肾移植术后应用他克莫司与西罗莫司为初始免疫抑制剂的荟萃分析
- Author:
Liwei LIU
;
Jindan HE
;
Xiaoshuo WANG
;
Meiling YAN
;
Yi ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Kidney transplantation;
Sirolimus;
Tacrolimus;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
2015;36(12):741-747
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.Method PubMed,Web of knowledge,Medline and the Cochrane controlled trials register,Chinese Biomedicaldatabase,and Vip database were searched with the terms and Boolean operators as (kidney transplantation OR renal transplantation) AND (sirolimus OR rapamycin OR rapamune) AND (tacrolimus OR FK506 OR prograf).Results retrieved were updated on November,2015.Data were extracted for patient and graft mortality,acute rejection (AR),wound complications,infection,GFR,withdrawl.Professional meta analysis software RevMan 5.3 was employed.Result Altogether,1810 patients from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.Patients in the sirolimus group showed a decreased rate of graft mortality and infection (RR =0.63,95％ CI,0.45-0.89,P=0.009;RR=4.42,95％ CI,1.73-11.31,P=0.002).Patients in the sirolimus group showed an increased rate of AR,wound complications,GFR,withdrawl (SMD=-0.52,95％ CI,-0.73-0.31,P＜0.000 01;RR=0.54,95％ CI,0.40-0.73,P＜0.000 1;RR=0.17,95％ CI,0.11-0.25,P＜0.000 01;RR =0.44,95％ CI,0.37-0.51,P＜0.000 01).The patient mortality was insignificantly different between two groups.Conclusion This meta-analysis concluded that sirolimus showed advantage over tacrolimus about safety when used early after renal transplantation.The options of immunosuppressive regimens after kidney transplantation should be based on the specific condition.To obtain more reliable and accurate clinical data,the RCTs with more rational design,higher methodological quality,larger sample size,including domestic patients,longer follow-up are still needed.
