"Laparoscopic ""end-corner"" anastomosis in double-stapling technique for mid-low rectal cancer resection"
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2016.02.007
- VernacularTitle:“端-角”吻合在腹腔镜下直肠低位双吻合中的应用及效果观察
- Author:
Shanliang HAN
;
Shaoji CHEN
;
Qinliang MO
;
Yuanming MA
;
Shiduo SONG
;
Hong ZHAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Rectal neoplasms;
Laparoscopes;
Colorectal surgery;
Postoperative complications
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2016;31(2):108-112
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe clinical efficacy and explore clinical value of a modified procedure of double-stapling technique for mid-low rectal cancer.Methods Clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection at the Department of General Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from February 2011 to February 2015 was analyzed retrospectively.According to the different ways in doing double-stapling technique,we divided patients into modified group (51 cases) and conventional group (74 cases).Parameters were compared between the two groups as general considerations,oncologic outcomes.Data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software packet,using t and x2 inspection.Results The difference of the general data of two groups was not statistically significant (P ＞ 0.05).Operation time in the modified group was longer than that of the conventional group [(169 ± 23) vs.(150 ±42)min,t =-3.150,P ＜0.05],but it had shorter drainage tube indwelling days [(7.9 ±2.9)d vs.(10.8±11.6)d,t=1.999,P＜0.05] and length of hospital stay after surgery [(10.0±3.6)d vs.(13.3 ± 13.7) d,t =1.025,P ＜ 0.05].The incidence of anastomotic leakage (2.0％ vs.18.9％,x2 =4.402,P ＜ 0.05) and tenesmus(3.9％ vs.17.6％,x2 =4.110,P ＜ 0.05) in the modified group was less than that of the conventional group.The difference in those areas was not statistically significant (P ＞ 0.05),such as intraopretive blood loss,per-anal exhaust time,consumption of liquid diet time,anastomotic bleeding,intestinal obstruction,reoperation for neostomy and infections.Conclusions Compared with traditional laparoscopic anterior resection,End-Corner anastomosis has the benefits of less postoperative anastomotic leakage and fewer low anterior resection syndrome.
