A retrospective comparison of four different procedures for extracting dermoid cyst by laparoscopy.
- Author:
Yoon S LEE
1
;
Taek H LEE
;
Young R CHO
;
Sang S CHUN
;
Il S PARK
;
In K KANG
;
Tae B KOO
;
Jin H CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Korea.
- Publication Type:Multicenter Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Dermoid cyst;
Laparoscopy
- MeSH:
Abdominal Cavity;
Abscess;
Colpotomy;
Dermoid Cyst*;
Fever;
Hernia;
Humans;
Laparoscopy*;
Length of Stay;
Operative Time;
Peritonitis;
Retrospective Studies*
- From:Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2002;45(2):239-243
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To compare results of 4 different extraction methods in laparoscopic management of dermoid cyst. STUDY DESIGN: This article is a retrospective, multicenter study for 247 patients with benign dermoid cyst in period of 1995-1998. Dermoid cyst was extracted by Endopouch (99 cases), puncture-irrigation-extraction (69 cases), colpotomy (35 cases), and dermoid cyst as a "pouch bag" (44 cases). RESULTS: We analyzed irrigation amount, operative time, postoperative hospital stay and complications by four different extraction methods. Endopouch extraction method needed less amount of irrigation fluid for cleaning the abdominal cavity and had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (ANOVA, p=0.0001). There were no significant differences in operative times among groups. There were four cases of morbidity in puncture-irrigation-extraction method (6%), three had fever (> 38degrees C) and one intraabdominal abscess. One incisional hernia was noted in "pouch bag" method (2%). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend minimal spillage method for extraction of dermoid and careful irrigation of abdominal cavity to prevent potential risk of chemical peritonitis such as Endopouch, "pouch bag", and colpotomy with the exception of puncture-irrigation-extraction method.
