Clinical research of the treatment on cervical esophagus fistula with low negative pressure suction by double caping pipe
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2016.03.017
- VernacularTitle:双套管持续冲洗低负压吸引治疗食管颈部吻合口瘘效果观察
- Author:
Sheng YAO
;
Canhui LIU
;
Nan YANG
;
Zhongdong LI
;
Demin LI
;
Guohua DONG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal cancer;
Cervical esophagus fistula;
Double caping pipe
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2016;32(3):251-254
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective to investigate the clinical effect of negative pressure suction by double caping pipe on cervical esophagus fistula after esophageal carcinoma surgery,and search for the effective treatment of cervical anastomotic fistula after esophageal carcinoma surgery.Methods The clinical data of 140 patients with cervical esophagus fistula after esophageal carcinoma surgery in Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Command from September 2004 to September 2015 were retrospective analyzed.Among them,85 cases were treated with low negative pressure suction by double caping pipe as experimental group,55 cases were treated with conventional drainage and dressing as the control group.The length of hospital stay,healing time,dressing frequency,neck bleeding risk,anastomotic stenosis and mortality rate between two groups were analyzed and compared.Results The length of hospital stay,the time of wound healing,the frequency of wound change dressing,the rate of neck bleeding in experimental group were (15.94± 1.57)d,(8.00± 1.55)d,(6.22± 1.52)times,1.18％ respectively,significantly lower than that of control group ((23.64 ± 2.36) d,(15.64 ± 2.08) d,(27.56±3.58) times,12.24％;P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.029).While the rate of anastomotic stenosis after half a year in experimental group was 17.65％,lower than that of the control group (23.64％),the difference was no significant(P=0.387).Conclusion The treatment on cervical esophagus fistula with low negative pressure suction by double caping pipe has superiorities on hospitalization and healing time,dressing frequency,neck bleeding risk,mortality,and does not increase the incidence of anastomotic stenosis,and it can achieve a better therapeutic effect compare with the conventional drainage and dressing.
