The diagnostic value of ultrasound contrast guided transrectal biopsy in prostate cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2016.01.005
- VernacularTitle:超声造影引导下经直肠穿刺活检在前列腺癌中的诊断价值
- Author:
Yunxin ZHAO
;
Yi JIANG
;
Min YAO
;
Jian WANG
;
Ying WANG
;
Guangli YAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Transrectal ultrasonography;
Ultrasonic contrast;
Prostate cancer
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2016;32(1):18-21
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical value of clinical application in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) by prostate biopsy guided by rectal ultrasound contrast guided biopsy.Methods One hundred and ninety-eight patients with prostate in Punan Hospital of Pudong New District of Shanghai were investigated.According to different detection methods, the research objects were divided into two groups, the patients were performed with the ultrasound contrast guided biopsy as the imaging group (n =96), the patients with Doppler ultrasound guided biopsy as the ultrasonic group(n =102).The puncture Results were compared with pathological diagnosis.The positive rate of PCa and number of puncture needle were compared with the two puncture methods.The value of the application of the prostate biopsy guided by rectal ultrasound in diagnosis of prostate cancer was evaluated.Result One hundred and ninety-eight patients were all received pathological diagnosis,78 cases benign lesions, 120 cases were diagnosed as PCa.Thirty-six cases of benign lesions were confirmed by pathological biopsy, 60 case PCa.There were 42 cases of benign lesions in ultrasonic group, 60 case PCa.The positive rate of PCa in the imaging groupwas 62.5％ (60/96), the ultrasonic group was 58.82％ (60/102).There was no difference in Pca positive rate between the ultrasound group and the contrast group(x2 =0.104, P=0.747).The positive number of Pca in the imaging group was 28.50％ (17/60), the difference was statistically significant higher than that of the common group(18.80％ (11/60), P =0.001).The average of the patients in the imaging group was 8.19 needle,less than the ultrasonic group per capita 11.31 needle less.When f/tPSA less than or equal to 0.15, Pca positive rate of the contrast group was 46.55％ (27/55), higher than the ultrasonic group(9.30％ (4/43)), the difference was statistically significant (P =0.001);when f/tPSA more than 0.15, the positive rate of Pca in the contrast group was 92.11％ (35/38), less than the ultrasound group (94.92 (56/59)), the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.89).Anal pain, hematuria and hematochezia in contrast group (7.29％ (7/96), 2.08％ (2/96), 10.42％ (10/96)) were significantly less than the ultrasound group(22.55％ (23/102), 8.82％ (9/102), 23.53％ (24/102)), the difference was statistically significant (P =0.003,0.039,0.014).Conclusion Under the guidance of ultrasound contrast, rectal biopsy has important diagnostic value for prostate cancer.Under the premise of reducing the number of puncture needle,can improvethe positive rate of Pca, reduce the pain of patients and the occurrence of complications after puncture.When f/tPSAless than or equal to 0.15,puncture positive rate in contrast group is higher than the ultrasonic group, puncture effect is better.
