Comparison of two different fixation methods for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborns
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2016.05.009
- VernacularTitle:新生儿经鼻持续正压通气两种不同固定方法的比较
- Author:
Wei TANG
;
Juan PENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Infant,newborn;
Nasal obstruction;
Continuous positive airway pressure;
Fixation;
Skin breakdown
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2016;32(5):355-357
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical application of two different fixation methods for nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in newborns. Methods One hundred and forty newborns who had NCPAP treatment were selected and divided into experimental group and control group with 70 cases in each group by random digits table method.The newborns in experimental group received self- made caps to fix the prong systems,while the newborns in control group received U shape towel. The incidence of nose, head of facial skin injury, frequency of detachment for nasal prongs and duration mechanical ventilation were compared between two groups. Results The frequency of detachment for nasal prongs per 24 h was (0.65±0.18) times in experimental group and (1.64±0.22) times in control group, and there was significant difference (t=28.68, P<0.01). The incidence of nose, head of facial skin injury were 8.6%(6/70), 2.9%(2/70) in experimental group and 27.1%(19/70), 14.3%(10/70) in control group,and there were significant differences ( χ2 =8.23, 5.83, P<0.01 or 0.05). There was no significant difference in duration mechanical ventilation between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusions Use of the self- made caps for NCPAP in newborns is associated with significant reduction in the incidence of nose, head of facial skin injury,and the frequency of detachment for nasal prongs.The fixation should be prompted in clinic.
