Clinical efficacy of preoperative three-dimensional radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.03.006
- VernacularTitle:食管癌术前3DRT 和同期放化疗疗效分析
- Author:
Wei DENG
;
Qifeng WANG
;
Zefen XIAO
;
Zongmei ZHOU
;
Hongxing ZHANG
;
Dongfu CHEN
;
Qinfu FENG
;
Jun LIANG
;
Zhouguang HUI
;
Jima LYU
;
Jie HE
;
Shugeng GAO
;
Qi XUE
;
Yousheng MAO
;
Kelin SUN
;
Xiangyang LIU
;
Dekang FANG
;
Guiyu CHENG
;
Dali WANG
;
Jian LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy;
Radiotherapy,preoperative;
Radiotherapy,three-dimensional;
Esophageal neoplasms/concurrent radiochenmotherapy;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2016;(3):220-226
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
[ Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of preoperative three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 103 esophageal carcinoma patients who received preoperative 3DRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy from 2004 to 2014 in Cancer Hospital CAMS.The median radiation dose was 40 Gy, and the TP or PF regimen was adopted for concurrent chemotherapy if needed.The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival ( DFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the survival difference and univariate prognostic analyses were performed by the log-rank test.The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.Results The number of patients followed at 3-years was 54.The 3-year OS and DFS rates were 61.1% and 54.9%, respectively, for all patients.There were no significant differences between the 3DRT and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) groups as to OS (P=0.876) and DFS (P=0.521).The rates of complete, partial, and minimal pathologic responses of the primary tumor were 48.0%, 40.2%, and 11.8%, respectively.There were significant differences in OS and DFS between the complete, partial, and minimal pathologic response groups (P=0.037 and 0.003). No significant difference in pathologic response rate was found between the 3DRT and CCRT groups (P=0.953).The lymph node metastasis rate was 26.5%, and this rate for the complete, partial, and minimal pathologic response groups was 14%, 30%, and 67%, respectively, with a significant difference between the three groups (P=0.001).The OS and DFS were significantly higher in patients without lymph node metastasis than in those with lymph node metastasis (P=0.034 and 0.020).The surgery-related mortality was 7.8% in all patients.Compared with the 3DRT group, the CCRT group had significantly higher incidence rates of leukopenia (P=0.002), neutropenia (P=0.023), radiation esophagitis (P=0.008), and radiation esophagitis ( P=0.023).Pathologic response of the primary tumor and weight loss before treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS (P=0.030,0.024 and P=0.003,0.042). Conclusions Preoperative 3DRT alone or with concurrent chemotherapy can result in a relatively high complete pathologic response rate, hence increasing the survival rate.Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm whether preoperative CCRT is better than 3DRT in improving survival without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.
