Long-term Comparison of Drug-eluting Stent Implantation Between Left Internal Mammary Artery Graft and NativeVessel in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016.01.003
- VernacularTitle:冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者左乳内动脉桥血管和自身血管置入药物洗脱支架长期疗效的对比
- Author:
Pei ZHANG
;
Jun DAI
;
Min YAO
;
Chaoyang ZHANG
;
Bo XU
;
Shijie YOU
;
Jue CHEN
;
Yongjian WU
;
Haibo LIU
;
Xuewen QIN
;
Shubin QIAO
;
Yuejin YANG
;
Jilin CHEN
;
Runlin GAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Angioplasty;
Drug-eluting stent;
Coronary artery bypass grafting
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2016;31(1):10-14
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To make long-term comparison of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation betweenleft internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft and native vessel in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: A total of 151 patients with anterior wall ischemia because of previous CABG induced LIMA graft lesion who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital from 2004-07 to 2012-12 were retrospectively studied. The clinical, coronaryangiography (CAG) and follow-up conditions for DES implantation were analyzed;according to the target vessel, the patients were divided into 2 groups:LIMA group, n=40 and Native vessel (NV) group, which meant all segments of left main to left anterior descending arteries, n=111. Primary end points included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion failure (TLF) as cardiac death, target vessel related non-fatal MI with the composition of TLR and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Results:The median follow-up time was 30 (10-100) months. The rates of TLR and TLF were similar between 2 groups:(15.0%vs 11.7%, log-rank P=0.65) and (17.5%vs 13.5%, log-rank P=0.63). MACE occurrence in LIMA group was higher than NV group (35.0%vs 18.0%, log-rank P=0.043) which was mainly presented by new non-target vessel revascularization as right coronary artery, left circumlfex and saphenous vein graft(17.5%vs 4.5%, log-rank P=0.014). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that target lesion stent length was the only independent predictor for both TLR (HR=1.03, 95%CI1.00-1.06, P=0.01) and TLF (HR=1.03, 95%CI1.00-1.05, P=0.02);whereas, LIMA-PCI was the only independent predictor for MACE occurrence (HR=3.09, 95%CI1.28-7.60, P=0.012).
Conclusion: The chances of TLR and TLF were similar inpatients with previous CABG by either LIMA or NV, while MACE occurrence was higher in LIMA patients which should be further investigated.
