The Impact on Clinical Results by Sagittal Imbalance in Posterior Fixation for Thoraco-lumbar Burst Fractures.
10.12671/jkfs.2011.24.4.354
- Author:
Seung Wook BAEK
1
;
Kyu Dong SHIM
;
Ye Soo PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea. hyparkys@hanyang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Unstable burst fracture;
Posterior fixation;
Sagittal imbalance
- MeSH:
Humans;
Spine
- From:Journal of the Korean Fracture Society
2011;24(4):354-360
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Evaluate the effects of sagittal imbalance on the clinical outcomes in thoracolumbar burst fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients who had received posterior fixation for unstable burst fractures. Radiologic assessment including the compression ratio, focal kyphotic angle and sagittal balance were obtained. The clinical outcomes were assessed by ODI, VAS and SF-36. We subdivided the patients into sagittal balance and imbalance group, and compared with clinical outcomes. The relationship between radiologic and clinical outcomes was examined using correlation analysis. RESULTS: The radiologic assessment were changed on preoperative and postoperative as follows: mean compression ratio: 15.2%, 4.9%, mean focal kyphotic angle: 43.2degrees, 20.9degrees. The mean sagittal balance was 11.5 cm. The mean score of VAS, ODI, Physical and Mental Component Summary of SF-36 were 3.7, 45.8, 43.3 and 39.8, respectively. The ODI was significantly higher in sagittal imbalance group, and SF-36 was significantly higher in sagittal balance group (p<0.05). The VAS was correlated with compression ratio and focal kyphotic angle. The ODI and Mental Component Summary of SF-36 were correlated with sagittal imbalance. CONCLUSION: Sagittal balance effects on the functions of spine, surgical treatment should be carefully considered with unstable burst fractures.
