Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in diagnosis of the first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2016.04.019
- VernacularTitle:经阴道超声和 MRI 对剖宫产术后早期子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较
- Author:
Li CHEN
;
Xiaojing LI
;
Lei LI
;
Ruoqin CHENG
;
Jinfeng ZENG
;
Yan HE
;
Hongyan PENG
;
Dan WANG
;
Lingli SHEN
;
Miao MA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
cesarean scar pregnancy;
ultrasonography;
magnetic resonance imaging
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2016;32(4):566-569
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the value of transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in diagnosis of the first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).Methods The transvaginal ultrasound and MRI data of 28 patients who were initially diagnosed as CSP were analyzed. Regarding the surgery and postoperative pathology as a gold standard,the differences between transvaginal ultrasound and MRI were compared in the sensitivity,specificity,diagnostic coincidence rate and the ability in showing the internal structure of gestational sac and its relationship with the surrounding tissue.Results 22 CSP patients were confirmed by surgical pathology in a total of 28 patients,while 20 CSP patients using transvaginal ultrasound and 1 9 using MRI were correctly diagnosed respectively,and the sensitivity,specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate were 90.9%,50.0%,82.1% vs 86.4%,83.3%,85.7%,respectively,exhibiting no statistical difference in the coincidence rates between two methods (χ2 =0.132,P=0.72 ).The pregnant bursa in 20 patients was found by pathology in 22 CSP patients,and 19 pregnant bursa with transvaginal ultrasound and 17 with MRI were confirmed respectively,exhibiting no statistical difference between two methods (χ2 =1.11,P =0.29).The yolk sac in 12 patients,embryos in 8,original heart tube in 5 and local scar pregnancy sac infiltration in 3 were found with transvaginal ultrasound,meanwhile those in 2,2,0 and 9 respectively were also found with MRI,exhibiting significant differences between the two methods (χ2 =13.8,P =0.000;χ2 =7.7,P =0.006;χ2 =7.2,P =0.007;χ2 =7.1,P=0.008).The pregnancy capsule hemorrhage in 7 patients and hemorrhage in uterine cavity in 9 were found with transvaginal ultrasound, meanwhile those in 14 and 1 5 were found with MRI,exhibiting significant differences (χ2 =6.6,P =0.01;χ2 =5.0,P =0.026). Conclusion The coincidence rate in diagnosis of CSP using transvaginal ultrasound or MRI is higher.Transvaginal ultrasound is superior to MRI in showing the yolk sac,embryos and original heart tube,while MRI is better than transvaginal ultrasound in showing the hemorrhage of uterine cavity or gestational sac and the relationship between pregnant bursa and the surrounding tissue.Combination of the two methods shows more value in early diagnosis of CSP.
