Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Physician Training System:Comparation of Harvard University and Capital Medical University
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.03.029
- VernacularTitle:哈佛大学与首都医科大学康复医学系脊髓损伤康复专业医师教育培训体系比较研究
- Author:
Fangyong WANG
;
Jianjun LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
spinal cord injury;
scholastic building;
physician training;
rehabilitation education;
Harvard University;
Capital Medical University
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2016;22(3):365-367
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the difference of the spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician training systems between Harvard Uni-versity and Capital Medical University. Methods The spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician training systems of Capital Medical Univer-sity and Harvard University were investigated, including the degree training time, residence training time, training fee and institution. Re-sults Degree education time was more in the basic science in Harvard University than in Capital Medical University. The residence training time was 7 years and 5 years for Harvard University and Capital Medical University, respectively, and the ratio of specialties and sub-spe-cialties was not significantly different. There was a total of 26 spinal cord injury community rehabilitation clinics in Harvard University sys-tem, and none in Capital Medical University. Conclusion Some light can be drawn from the spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician train-ing system of Harvard University, to improve the scholastic building of Capital Medical University.
