Conventional and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules:A Meta-analysis
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2015.11.021
- VernacularTitle:常规超声与超声造影诊断甲状腺结节的Meta分析
- Author:
Ting LIANG
;
Zheng CUI
;
Ming CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Thyroid nodule;
Ultrasonography;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography;
Contrast media;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
2015;(11):871-875
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose There is no agreement for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. This paper aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of the conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of thyroid nodule by meta analysis. Materials and Methods Literature search was performed in PubMed, CNKI and Wanfang databases to identify relevant English and Chinese literatures by using pathological results as the gold standard from January 1990 to September 2014. The quality of each selected study was evaluated by QUADAS. The pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity and the corresponding 95% CI were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under curve (AUC) and the Q* index were also calculated. Results A total of 14 literatures (1970 nodules) were included, the pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity of conventional ultrasonography were 0.74 and 0.70; those of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were 0.86 and 0.82. The AUC by using the two methods were 0.84 and 0.93, respectively, and the Q* index were 0.77 and 0.86, respectively. Conclusion In the diagnosis of thyroid nodule, the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is better than conventional ultrasound; however, both of them have high clinical value in the diagnosis of thyroid nodule, thus they are helpful in avoidance of unnecessary surgical treatment in patients with thyroid disease.
