Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy
10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.12.001
- VernacularTitle:单切口腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜治疗输卵管妊娠的比较
- Author:
Ke MA
;
Xi YANG
;
Ling YIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery;
Tubal pregnancy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2015;(12):1057-1060
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery ( SILS) in the treatment of tubal pregnancy, as compared with conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. Methods Sixty-two patients diagnosed as tubal pregnancy undergoing laparoscopic surgery at this hospital between September 2013 and June 2014 were selected for investigation. There were 29 cases of transumbilical SILS ( SILS group) and 33 cases of conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery ( MPLS group) . We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients and analyzed the surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, surgical complications and hospital stay. Results In both groups, all procedures were performed without failure.No conversion to open surgery or additional skin incision was needed.There were no differences between the SILS and MPLS groups in the operation time [(51.5 ±10.8) min vs.(47.3 ±9.4) min, t=1.637, P=0.107], the mean estimated blood loss [(15.5 ±10.5) ml vs.(18.4 ±12.2) ml, t=-0.996, P=0.323], the absolute decrease of hemoglobin from preoperative to postoperative [(14 ± 5) g/L vs.(13 ±4) g/L, t=0.874, P=0.386], the postoperative hospital stay [(3.5 ±0.9) d vs.(3.8 ±0.8) d, t=-1.390, P=0.170], and the incidence of postoperative fever (2 cases vs.3 cases, χ2 =0.000, P=1.000).Follow-up for 1-3 months ( mean, 1.8 months) in all the cases showed smooth recovery and no postoperative complications. Conclusion SILS is a feasible and safe approach in the treatment of tubal pregnancy.
