Comparison of digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithoto-my for renal calculi
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2016.05.011
- VernacularTitle:电子输尿管软镜与微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的比较
- Author:
Qingfu DENG
;
Rui JIANG
;
Lijun PEI
;
Yongsheng ZHU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Renal calculi;
Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy;
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2016;32(5):721-723
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect and safety of digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi. Methods Clinic data of 105 cases with kidney stones were analyzed retrospectively, including 53 cases with digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (group A) and 52 with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (group B). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, stone-free rate, complications, average hospitalization time were compared. Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, stone surface area, average operative time, stone-free rate and complications between two groups. Significant differences were found between group A and group B in terms of intraoperative blood loss and average hospitalization time. Conclusions Digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy has similar effect as minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones about 20 mm in terms of average operative time, stone-free rate, and complications, but excels minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in intraopera-tive blood loss and average hospitalization time. Digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy can be the first choice for the treatment of kidney stones about 20 mm.
