The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275
- Author:
Ugur DEVECI
1
;
Umut BARBAROS
;
Mahmut Sertan KAPAKLI
;
Manuk Norayk MANUKYAN
;
Selcuk SIMSEK
;
Abut KEBUDI
;
Selcuk MERCAN
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. opdrdeveci@yahoo.com
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Surgery;
Laparoscopy;
Cholecystectomy
- MeSH:
Cholecystectomy;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*;
Conversion to Open Surgery;
Demography;
Diagnosis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Gallbladder Diseases;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Prospective Studies*
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2013;85(6):275-282
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intra-abdominal surgery with minimal trauma. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study we aimed to compare results of SILS cholecystectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic (TPCL) cholecystectomy prospectively. METHODS: In this prospective study, 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease were randomly allocated to SILS cholecystectomy (group 1) or TPCL cholecystectomy (group 2). Demographics, pathologic diagnosis, operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, pain score, conversion rate, and satisfaction of cosmetic outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-four SILS cholesystectomies (88%) and 42 TPCL cholecystectomies (84%) were completed successfully. Conversion to open surgery was required for 4 cases in group 1 and 6 cases in group 2. Operating time was significantly longer in group 1 compared with group 2 (73 minutes vs. 48 minutes; P < 0.05). Higher pain scores were observed in group 1 versus group 2 in postoperative day 1 (P < 0.05). There was higher cosmetic satisfaction in group 1 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SILS cholecystectomy performed by experienced surgeons is at least as successful, feasible, effective and safe as a TPCL cholecystectomy. Surgeons performing SILS should have a firm foundation of advanced minimal access surgical skills and a cautious, gradated approach to attempt the various procedures. Prospective randomized studies comparing single access versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with large volumes and long-term follow-up, are needed to confirm our initial experience. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01772745.)
