Comparison for Manipulation and Bed Rest in Treatment of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain
10.11842/wst.2015.10.018
- VernacularTitle:推拿与卧床休息干预急性非特异性腰痛的比较＊
- Author:
Shiguo YUAN
;
Xiaohong QIN
;
Yucong ZOU
;
Pei ZHANG
;
Meixiong CHEN
;
Jian HUANG
;
Yikai LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Acute nonspecific low back pain;
manipulation;
Chinese Oswestry Disability Index;
acceptance
- From:
World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2015;(10):2056-2059
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy, acceptance, complications / adverse events treated with traditional manipulation and bed rest for patients with acute nonspecific low back pain (ANLBP). A total of 60 ANLBP patients were distributed into the Group A/B randomly and equally. Patients in Group A were treated by bed rest absolutely for one week; meanwhile patients in Group B were treated by traditional manipulation for one week. IBM SPSS20.0 was used to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), acceptance, complications / adverse events and others. The results showed that VAS and ODI reduced after one-week treatment in Group A and B (t = 14.67, 11.55, allP < 0.001 andt = 24.80, 15.35, allP <0.001). Differences of VAS and ODI were with significant difference between Group A and B (t = 3.24, 2.75,P =0.002, 0.009). Scores of acceptance and complications / adverse events were with significant difference between Group A and B (t = 2.65,P = 0.01 andχ2= 10.00,P = 0.002). It was concluded that both manipulation and bed rest can alleviatepain due to ANLBP, promote functional recovery. However, traditional manipulation can better improve symptoms, easier to be accepted by patients with less complications / adverse events.
