A novel integrated patient specific instrumentation system and its application for total knee arthroplasty
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.03.003
- VernacularTitle:个性化手术导板在全膝关节置换术中的应用
- Author:
Bing QIU
;
Mingjiao ZHANG
;
Bensen TANG
;
Fei LIU
;
Weimin ZHU
;
Dong ZHEN
;
Fang LIU
;
Biyong DENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty,replacement,knee;
Individuality;
Imaging,three-dimensional
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2016;(3):143-150
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the accuracy of preoperative planning and postoperative satisfaction of prosthesis posi?tion by applying the personal surgical cutting guide (PSCG) to total knee arthroscopy (TKA) based on 3D printing technique. Meth?ods In this randomized study, 20 patients were selected from August 2014 to October 2015, who were randomly divided into two groups. In PSCG group, 4 males and 6 females were enrolled, with a mean age of 70.9±6.69 (from 59 to 78) years. In con?ventional instrumentation group, 2 males and 8 females were enrolled, with a mean age of 69.9 ± 6.35 (from 58 to 77) years. The conventional instrumentation group was treated with conventional TKA, while the PSCG group was treated with personal surgical cutting guides. Then the knee valgus angle of patients, the angle between prosthesis components on the coronal and the sagittal plane of two groups were evaluated. Subsequently the correlation of the actual osteotomy amount, the valgus angle, caster angle, external rotation angle between intra? and preoperative planning were compared in the PSCG group. Results Compared with the ideal value of each angle, the mean deviation of the hip?knee?ankle angle 0.77°±0.51°, frontal femoral compo?nent angle 0.37° ± 0.53° and frontal tibial component angle 0.11° ± 0.24° showed statistically significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). The mean deviation of the lateral femoral component angle and the lateral tibial component angle (respectively 8.26°±0.85°, 0.71°±0.77°) were smaller than that of the conventional instrumentation group, while the differences all had no statis?tically significant difference (P>0.05). The actual osteotomy amount, the valgus angle, caster angle, external rotation angle corre?lated well between intra?and preoperative planning (t=-2.547, 3.864, 0.537,-0.040,-1.290, P>0.05). Conclusion TKA assist?ed by PSCG can make lower extremity alignment and accuracy of prosthesis implantation more accurate compared with convention?al TKA, especially in hip?knee?ankle angle, frontal femoral component angle and frontal tibial component angle.
