Porous beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft fusion for repair of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis：a comparison of vertebral fusion ratesviadifferent appraches
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.34.001
- VernacularTitle:多孔β-磷酸三钙植骨融合修复退变性腰椎滑脱：不同入路椎体融合率的比较
- Author:
Yongjie MU
;
Jiehe ZHANG
;
Songchao SHEN
;
Bozhi FENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Calcium Phosphates;
Spinal Fusion;
Spondylolysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2015;(34):5413-5417
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:In recent years, pedicle internal fixation, spinal canal decompression and bone graft fusion have been used in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by lumbar spinal stenosis and have achieved good results, which increase the fusion rate. However, there is a large difference between the therapeutic effects of different surgical methods. OBJECTIVE:To contrast the repair effect of posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS:Forty patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by lumbar spinal stenosis were enroled, including 11 males and 29 females, aged 56-74 years. Al patients received the combined treatment of pedicle internal fixation, spinal canal decompression and bone graft fusion. The 19 of 40 patients received posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the rest 21 patients underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Al the patients were folowed up for 6 months after treatment, and the visual analog scores, Oswestry function index, bone fusion rate, lumbar function score and complication occurrence were analyzed and
compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The visual analog scores and Oswestry function index were both improved significantly in the two groups at 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05). No difference was found in the bone fusion rate, visual analog scores and Oswestry function index between the two groups. But compared with the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group, the lumbar functional recovery and incidence of complications were better in the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that both posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by lumbar spinal stenosis can achieve good results in the bone fusion rate, and however, the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is better to protect the nerve root and dural sac and to promote lumbar functional recovery.
