Application of several severity scoring systems in pediatrics
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2015.10.011
- VernacularTitle:几种重症评分在儿科的临床应用
- Author:
Wenfeng LU
;
Lijie WANG
;
Chunfeng LIU
;
Jie ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Critical illness;
Critical care scores;
Prognosis;
Children
- From:
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
2015;22(10):714-717
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of several scoring systems including of acute physiol-ogy and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ)score,sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score,pediatric risk of mortality score(PRISM),pediatric critical illness score(PCIS)and paediatric index of mortality(PIM)in estimating the prognosis of illness in pediatric severe cases.To select a more appropriate scoring system for PICU.Methods From January 2013 to December 2014,486 cases admissed in PICU of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled in the study,including 42 hospital death cases (dead group)and 444 survived or cured cases(survival group).We estimated each patient with APACHEⅡ,SOFA,PCIS,PRISM and PIM on admission and compared the scores between dead group and survival group.Results The results of APACHE Ⅱ,SOFA,PCIS,PRISM,PIM showed significant defferences be-tween dead group and survival group(13.43 ±8.70 vs.3.48 ±3.94;78.38 ±9.33 vs.88.24 ±6.84;0.142 0 ±0.214 7 vs.0.015 3 ±0.030 7;5.48 ±3.42 vs.1.73 ±1.94;22.02 ±8.48 vs.12.68 ±4.88,P <0.001 ). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of APACHE Ⅱ,SOFA,PRISM,PCIS and PIM (95%CI)were 0.854 (0.798,0.910 ),0.838 (0.778,0.898 ),0.881 (0.828,0.934 ),0.808 (0.748, 0.869),0.936(0.913,0.960).Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of PIM was the lar-gest.Conclusion All the 5 kinds of severe scoring systems are effective and have a good ability to asses the prognosis and severity of diseases.It seems that PIM is the most effective.
