Discussion on the optimal retrieval time of Cook Medical inferior vena cava filters
10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2015.10.018
- VernacularTitle:Cook腔静脉滤器回收时机探讨
- Author:
Hongfeng SHI
;
Ying XIAO
;
Shouguang SUI
;
Yimin DENG
;
Wei LI
;
Xiaofei ZHANG
;
Mengfei ZHONG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity;
inferior vena cava filter;
filter retrieval
- From:
Journal of Interventional Radiology
2015;(10):906-909
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the optimal retrieval time of the indwelling Gunther Tulip and Cook Celcet inferior vena cava filters (VCF). Methods During the period from March 2013 to April 2015 at Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, the implantation of retrievable inferior vena cava filter was performed in 58 patients. Among the 58 patients, Gunther Tulip VCF was used in 13 and Cook Celcet VCF was employed in 31. Twenty-one patients followed the doctor's advice to receive retrieval procedure of VCF within three months after the implantation. Results Among the 21 patients, successful retrieval of VCF was obtained in 19. The mean indwelling time of Gunther Tulip VCF was 54.4 days, the longest time being 79.0 days. Gunther Tulip VCF was successfully removed in 3 patients and retrieval of VCF failed in 2 patients, with a retrieval success rate of 60%. The mean indwelling time of Cook Celcet VCF was 37.6 days, the longest time being 67.0 days. Cook Celcet VCF was successfully removed in 16 patients, with the success rate of retrieval being 100%. Conclusion Despite many VCFs that have been indwelled for a long time can be safely retrieved, retrieval procedure should be performed as early as possible in order to improve the retrieval success rate of VCF. It seems that the use of Cook Celcet VCF is a better choice although it is more expensive.
