Risk Assessment on Carcinogenic Pesticides of Vegetables in Korea.
- Author:
Jae Hong YOON
1
;
Jong Tae LEE
;
Yong CHUNG
;
Dongchun SHIN
Author Information
1. Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Risk assessment;
Carcinogenic pesticides
- MeSH:
DDT;
Dieldrin;
Eating;
Heptachlor Epoxide;
Humans;
Korea*;
Limit of Detection;
Pesticides*;
Public Health;
Risk Assessment*;
Seoul;
Vegetables*
- From:Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine
1999;32(2):155-161
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to estimate the carcinogenic risks from the ingestion of some carcinogenic pesticides (CPs) in vegetables sampled at a local agricultural product market in Seoul. METHODS: After applying a hazard identification step, we selected four pesticides, such as DDT, dieldrin, folpet, and heptachlor epoxide, for this risk assessment. Concentrations of each pesticide were measured from randomly sampled vegetables. In order to estimate the human exposure levels, we combined the concentration of pesticides in the vegetables with consumption rate of those vegetables. Three scenarios were hypothesized for human exposure assessment. Scenario I was the most conservative which supposed the undetected CPs would be the detection limit values. Scenario II was assumed that the undetected CPs would be a half of the detection limit values, and finally scenario III merely considered only values greater than the detection limit values. We finally presented the estimated carcinogenic risks on the basis of the traditional risk assessment procedure suggested by U.S. EPA. RESULTS: Pesticides including DDT, dieldrin, folpet and heptachlor epoxide were detected in 9 samples (6%) in the range of 0.0006~0.09ppm. The daily intake levels of carcinogenic pesticides were estimated in the range of 0.0009~0.0079 microgram/day. As we expected, excess cancer risks based on scenario I was also the highest (1.1x10-8~ 5.5x10-5). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the estimated risks from the pesticides we investigated were not serious. We, however, propose that a continuos monitoring is needed to make sure for the protection of public health.
