Comparative study of dosimetry between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for brain metastases
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2015.32.026
- VernacularTitle:多发脑转移癌容积弧形调强与适形调强的剂量学对比研究
- Author:
Bin LONG
;
Yue XIE
;
Yong JIANG
;
Shujie LI
;
Da QIU
;
Ying WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
brain metastases;
volume modulated arc therapy;
intensity-modulated radiation therapy;
dosimetry
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2015;(32):4535-4537
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare volumetric‐modulated arc therapy(VMAT) with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for brain metastases with regard to the dosimetric character .Methods Sixty patients who were diagnosed with brain me‐tastases were included in this study .The target area received two dose levels using late addition amount technique ,WBRT (30 Gy/10 F) with following addition (20 Gy/10 F) to 59 Gy .For a fair comparison ,VMAT and IMRT treatment plans were respectively designed for every patient with the same dosimetric constraints .Dosimetric comparisons between VMAT and IMRT plans were ana‐lyzed to evaluate :target coverage and homogeneity ,conformity of PTV ;sparing of OARs ;monitor units (MUs) .Results Two treatment plans all reached the treatment need .When compared with IMRT ,there was no significant difference in Dmean of eyeball , len ,optic never ,visual chiasma ,parotid ,brain stem ,and external auditory canal of VMAT (P>0 .05) .The Dmax of eyeball ,len ,pa‐rotid ,and external auditory canal of VMAT were lower than that in IMRT group (P<0 .05) .The VMAT group has the less MUs (P=0 .017) and less treatment time .Conclusion VMAT can reach the big‐dose radiotherapy need on brain metastases clinically . There are no significant diffference between VMAT and IMRT on Dmax ,Dmean ,CI ,and HI .The Dmax of eyeball ,len ,parotid ,and external auditory canal of VMAT were lower than that in IMRT group .The VMAT can reduce the radiotherapy time .
