Analysis of Clinical Response on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients of Chronic Heart Failure With Different QRS Wave Morphology
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2015.09.011
- VernacularTitle:不同QRS波形态的慢性心力衰竭患者对心脏再同步化治疗的临床反应性
- Author:
Liguo JIAN
;
Shichao LIU
;
Tongbin DING
;
Jiangtao ZHAO
;
Dong CHENG
;
Yujie ZHAO
;
Yiqiang YUAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
QRS wave morphology;
Chronic heart failure;
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2015;(9):867-871
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the clinical response on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients of chronic heart failure (CHF) with different QRS wave morphology. Methods: A total of 52 CHF patients received CRT in our hospital and the Seventh People's Hospital of Zhengzhou City from 2010-03 to 2013-07 were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into 3 groups: True-complete left bundle branch block (t-CLBBB) group,n=20, Classic LBBB (CLBBB) group,n=15 and IVCD group,n=17. The general clinical condition, the indexes of echocardiography at 6 months of follow-up study including left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA classiifcation and 6-MWT were examined and compared among different groups. Results: In general clinical condition, the ratio of non-ischemic heart disease patients in t-CLBBB group was higher than those in CLBBB group and IVCD group, allP<0.05. By 6 months follow-up study, LVEDD in t-CLBBB group (62.6 ± 8.9) mm was lower than those in CLBBB group (70.0 ± 8.9) mm and IVCD group (72.8 ± 8.0) mm, LVEF was higher in t-CLBBB group (38.5 ± 6.2) % than those in CLBBB group (31.7 ± 6.7) % and IVCD group (30.1 ± 6.7) %. NYHA classiifcation in t-CLBBB group (2.00 ± 0.45) grade was lower than those in CLBBB group (2.73 ± 0.80) grade and IVCD group (3.12 ± 0.78) grade . 6-MWT in t-CLBBB group (302.0 ± 57.9) m was longer than those in CLBBB group (257.3 ± 59.0) m and IVCD group (220.2 ± 57.9) m, allP<0.05. Conclusion: CRT is an effective method for treating CHD patients, different QRS morphology may have different response, the patients with t-CLBBB would make better response.
