Ethical Issues of Privacy Protection Caused by Biobanks Research in Data Context
10.11842/wst.2015.07.039
- VernacularTitle:生物样本研究数据环境与受试者隐私保护伦理问题
- Author:
Lingfeng ZENG
;
Jun LIU
;
Jianke PAN
;
Lu WANG
;
Ye CAO
;
Qubo CHEN
;
Xing ZENG
;
Weixiong LIANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Biobanks;
privacy protection;
ethical issues;
data context
- From:
World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2015;(7):1567-1576
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
In traditional biomedical research, a series of mechanism and measures had been taken for identity protection of data subjects, such as data disclosure in aggregated methods, information restricted in public only after identified variables removal and etc. The purpose of such process was aimed to properly keep confidentiality of health information for the target subjects in research. As the protection of subject privacy was viewed as one of the most essential principle of medical ethics in human research, the effects to fulfill and accomplish such process can help to maintain the trust and support among participants and social public. Currently, such traditional modes of privacy safeguard are widely-applied in genetics and genomics study. However, the universal applicability also causes a number of controversies, and the effectiveness remains to be proven. Nowadays, the risk assessments of data subjects’ privacy call for taking the whole“data context” into consideration, not just self-restricted in isolation and confined to quality control of data disclosure. With the soaring increasing of data resources in research involved human subjects, the issues of releasing genetic data have caused more and more public attention, especially for the sensitive domains of privacy protection. Based on the core problem and principles, this article attempted to discuss the controversial bioethical issues such as data context, data-intruder concept, privacy of data subject, identity control of releasing data, potential risk of individual identification, privacy protection of data subject, and etc. We hope these considerations can provide references to the bioethical understanding of biobanks research and decision-making of ethic review.
