Comparison of Shikani optical stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation
10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.05.024
- VernacularTitle:Shikani 喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜在双腔气管导管插管中的比较
- Author:
Ting XU
;
Min LI
;
Xiangyang GUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Double-lumen endotracheal tube;
Intubation;
Shikani optical stylet;
Laryngoscopy;
Tho-racic surgery;
Anesthesia,general
- From:
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)
2015;(5):853-857
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of Shikani ( S) optical stylet and Macintosh (M) laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation .Methods:In the study, 60 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were randomly allocated to group S ( n=30 ) and group M ( n=30 ) . After general anesthesia induction , the patients in group S and group M were intubated double-lumen en-dotracheal tube ( DLT) by Shikani optical stylet ( SOS) and macintosh laryngoscope respectively .Intuba-tion time, intubation attempts , cuff broken and oral mucosal or dental injury were recorded;Blood pres-sure and heart rate at baseline ( T0 ) , at the time of intubaiton onset ( T1 ) , 1 minute after intubaiton (T2), 3 minutes after intubation (T3) and 5 minutes after intubation (T3) were also recorded;Hoarse-ness and throat sore of the patients 24 hours after surgery were evaluated .Results:The intubaiton time with the SOS was faster than with the Macintosh [(37.4 ±9.7) s vs.(43.9 ±13.7) s, P=0.039] and the first attempt success rate (87%vs.80%, P=0.488) did not differ between the groups; No tube cuff broke in both the groups;Group S had fewer patients who suffered oral mucosal or dental injury than group M (8 vs.2, P=0.038);The blood pressure and heart rate at T0,T1,T2,T3 and T4 did not differ between the groups;Throat sore(7 vs.10, P=0.390) and hoarseness (5 vs.7, P=0.519) incidence did not differ between the groups .Conclusion:By comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope , the SOS provides faster DLT intubation and causes less oral Mucosal or dental injury .
