The Effect Of Hyaluronic Acid On Xenograft In Rat Calvarial Defect.
- Author:
I Su JO
1
;
Seung Ki MIN
Author Information
1. Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Won-kwang University, Korea. omsmin@wonkwang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hyaluronic acid;
Xenograft;
Rat Calvaria;
Bone Defect;
DFDBA
- MeSH:
Animals;
Bone Transplantation;
Fibrosis;
Hand;
Heterografts*;
Humans;
Hyaluronic Acid*;
Osteoblasts;
Osteoclasts;
Osteogenesis;
Rabeprazole;
Rats*;
Skull;
Transplants
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2002;28(3):205-215
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tissue response in various bone grafting materials, especially xenogenous bone materials in vivo, compare of bone formation capacity of various bone grafting materials on rat skull defects and evaluate the effect of Hyaluronic acid on healing of human Demineralized Freezed Dried Bone allogenous graft (DFDBA) materials in rat calvarial defects. 30 Sprague-Dawly rats were divided into 4 groups. 7 X 7 mmsize bony defect were artificially prepared in the calvaria (both parietal bone) of all 30 rats and follwed group grafting of autogenous bone graft on right side and allogenic DFDBA on left side bone graft (rat DFDB) in 15 control group, but in 15 experimental group, xenograft (human DFDB) on left side, hyaluronic acid treated with xenograft on right side. Sequential sacrifices was performed at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks of experiment. These specimens were stained with HandE and MT stain, and then histologic analysis under light microscope was carried out. There were inflammatory reaction in all graft material during early stage. Autogenous and Allogenous DFDBA graft group observed inflammatory reaction at 1 week. Xenograft group persistant inflammatory reaction until 4 weeks, but in HA treated xenograft group inflammatory reaction was decreased at 2 weeks. Osteoblastic activity in control group was begun at 2 week, xenograft group was delayed at 6 weeks, however HA treated xenograft group was begun at 4 weeks. At 2 week, mild osteoclastic activity were observed in all xenograft group not in concerned to HA, but there was no difference each group after 4 weeks. There are most activated angiogenesis around graft mateirals in xenograft group at 2 weeks, but in HA treated xenograft group, decreased angiogenesis was observed at same time. Bone formation and bone maturation of xenograft group, there was no difference in HA treatment, was less than control group. Fibrosis around xenograft materials were observed until 6 weeks, there was no difference between xenograft and HA treated groups.
