A comparison of rehabilitation effection between standard the effect of standard aerobic training and combined aerobic training on patients with chronic heart failure
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2015.24.021
- VernacularTitle:慢性心力衰竭患者标准有氧训练与组合式训练的效果比较
- Author:
Hang CHEN
;
Tong LIU
;
Hao WANG
;
Cong LU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
heart failure;
rehabilitation;
aerobic training;
resistance training;
breathing machine training
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2015;(24):3370-3373
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the rehabilitation effection between standard aerobic training and combined aerobic train-ing in patients with chronic heart failure.Methods Eligible 27 patients with chronic heart failure were collected and divided into two groups:AT group (standard aerobic training)and ARI group (combined aerobic training).Then two groups underwent differ-ent trainings in 12 weeks respectively.Various indexs such as PImax,QME,QMTpeak ,1RM,exercise time,MLwHFQ,and Borg Scale was analyzed before and after the training.Results QMTpeak ,IRM,QME,PImax and SPImax in ARI group were better than those in AT group(P <0.05).And all these index of ARI group also developed compared with before the training(P <0.05),while in AT group,only QME and PImax changed(P <0.05).Both group′s Peak VO2 ,excrcise time,VT increased significantly,and VE/VCO2 slope、SBPpeak and CP of them improved.Compared with AT group,the exercise time of ARI group was longer(P =0.01 ). The echocardiographic parameters of ARI group improved after training(P <0.05),while only LVEF and LVESD had significant different in AT group(P <0.05).MLwHFQ,Brog scale score of ARI group were better than those in AT group.And only MLwH-FQ NYHA in ARI group improved after training(P <0.05).Conclusion The strength of the upper limb and respiratory muscle cardiopulmonary function,and quality of life have been improved markedly in ARI group.
