Percutaneous verterbroplasty with bone cement injection for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via transpedicular approach
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.30.026
- VernacularTitle:经皮椎体成形骨水泥注入修复骨质疏松性胸腰椎体压缩骨折:椎弓根入路方案
- Author:
Jia CAI
;
Yingwei HAO
;
Chao LI
;
Huaqun YANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2015;19(30):4892-4897
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Studies have shown that percutaneous vertebroplasty is a better method to repair osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but there are stil less specific schemes of transpedicular approach. Whether unipedicular or bipedicular approach is preferred is stil controversial. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous verterbroplastyviaunipedicular and bipedicular approach on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. METHODS:Totaly 118 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who had been admitted at the Department of Orthopedics, the First People's Hospital of Kashi from June 2010 to June 2013 and folowed up over 1 year were enroled and randomly divided into unipedicular and bipedicular groups, with 59 in each group. These two groups were compared in terms of bone cement volume, bone cement leakage, kyphosis correction, vertebral height restoration, visual analog scale score, Oswestry disability index, activity of daily living scale score, SF-36 score, and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The cement leakage rate was lower in the unipedicular group (34%) than the bipedicular group (37.3%), but there was no significant difference (P=0.701 > 0.05). The kyphosis correction and scoliosis correction had no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean vertebral height was improved significantly in both two groups at 1 year after operation (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the two groups before and after operation (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of visual analog scale score, Oswestry disability index, activity of daily living scale score, SF-36 score before and after operation, but these indexes were al improved significantly in each group at 1 year after operation than before operation (P < 0.05). The bone cement amount of the unipedicular group was lower than that of the bipedicular group (P=0.001 < 0.05), and the operation time was also shorter in the unipedicular group than the bipedicular group (P=0.000 < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in the two groups. These findings indicate that percutaneous verterbroplasty via unipedicular and bipedicular approach has good analgesic and repair outcomes in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, and the unipedicular approach is better than the bipedicular approach in the folowing aspects: less bone cement volume, lower cement leakage and shorter operation time.
