Comparison and Analysis of the Reference Intervals of 9 Serum Routine Chemical Analytes between the Current Application of Clinical Laboratories and the Latest Health Industrial Standards Draft for Approval
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.03.011
- VernacularTitle:国内临床化学9项常规项目参考区间与即将发布的卫生行业标准的比较和分析
- Author:
Kun ZHONG
;
Wei WANG
;
Falin HE
;
Zhiguo WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
routine chemistry;
reference interval;
health industry standard
- From:
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
2015;(3):38-42
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the current application status of reference intervals in routine chemistry and compare with the current health industry standards draft for approval.Methods By using web-based external quality assessment (EQA)software system,collected the submitted data from the laboratories which attended national reference intervals inves-tigation,used professional statistical software to analyze the data.Results 385 laboratories had submitted the investigation results.The vast majority of the analytes of attended laboratories had significant statistical differences in comparison with the health industry standards draft for approval in no grouping and not filled groups[t = - 55.435 ~ 17.070,P < 0.05, 86.1% (31/36)].Only a few of laboratories’reference interval had been grouped (approximately 20%).There were some differences in grouping rules between laboratories and standards.Even though some of the laboratories adopt the grouping rules as same as the standards,there were still big differences in reference intervals between the laboratories and the stand-ards[t=-39.365~13.155,P <0.01,62.5% (10/16)].Conclusion The reference intervals of routine chemistry analytes suggested by the health industry standards draft for approval had quite big differences from the reference intervals used in current clinical laboratories daily work.It is important to propel the authority health industry standards to use in the daily work of clinical laboratories.The evaluation and validation of using them should be done first.
