The Usefulness of Initial Arterial Base Deficit in Trauma Patients.
- Author:
Eun Hun LEE
1
;
Jae Young CHOI
;
Young Cheol CHOI
;
Seong Youn HWANG
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Masan Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Masan, Korea. masancyc@hanmir.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Base deficit;
Trauma;
Outcome;
Triage
- MeSH:
Blood Gas Analysis;
Blood Transfusion;
Emergencies;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Humans;
Korea;
Medical Records;
Mortality;
Prospective Studies;
Retrospective Studies;
ROC Curve;
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome;
Triage
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Traumatology
2006;19(1):67-73
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The arterial base deficit (BD) has proven to be useful in the evaluation and management of trauma patients. Indicators such as the Triage-Revised Trauma Score (t-RTS) and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score have been used as triage tools for emergency trauma patients in Korea. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of the initial BD in predicting injury severity and outcome in the trauma population. METHODS: The medical records of 308 consecutive trauma patients admitted to the Emergency Center of Masan Samsung Hospital from January 2004 to December 2004 were carefully examined prospectively and retrospectively, and 291 patients were selected as subjects for this research. The SIRS score and the t-RTS were calculated based on the records from the emergency department, and the BD was calculated based on the arterial blood gas analysis obtained within 30 minutes of admission. The efficiency of the three indicators as triage tools was evaluated by using cross tabulations in two - by - two matrices and by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: When the mortality was used as the outcome parameter, the sensitivity and the accuracy of the initial BD were higher than those of the SIRS score (p<0.05) and were same as those of the t-RTS. The areas under the ROC curves of the initial BD, the SIRS score, and the t-RTS were 0.740+/-0.087, 0.696+/-0.082, and 0.871+/-0.072, respectively (95% confidence interval). When emergency operation and blood transfusion requirements were used as outcome parameters, the comparisons of the sensitivities and the accuracies of the initial BD and the other two indicators showed the same pattern as mentioned above. The areas under the ROC curves of the initial BD were 0.7~0.8 and were larger than those of the SIRS score (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The ability of the initial BD to predict injury severity and outcome was similar to those of the t- RTS and the SIRS score. Therefore, the authors suggest that the initial BD may be used as an alternative to previous triage tools for trauma patients
