The clinical study of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in cholecystectomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2015.07.025
- VernacularTitle:经脐单孔腹腔镜在胆囊切除术中的应用
- Author:
Yongqiang WU
;
Quanfeng ZHANG
;
Zhikun LU
;
Yongfei GE
;
Demou HE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscop;
Cholecystectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2015;(7):1035-1037
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the safety and effectiveness of laparoendoscopic single -site surgery (LESS)in cholecystectomy.Methods LESS and conventional laparoscopic(LC)effect were compared and analyzed in cholecystectomy.48 cases were divided into the two groups,24 cases(group LESS)were cheated by laparoendo-scopic single-site surgery;24 cases(group LC)were cheated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Contrasted in their operation time,intraoperative amount of bleeding,intraoperative laparotomy rate,body temperature after operation, complications,intestinal recovery time (postoperative exhaust),hospitalization time after operation,postoperative pain index,cosmetic effect,white blood cell (WBC),serum cortisol (Cortisol,Cor),immunoglobulin A (IgA)and comple-ment (C3 ).Results All cases were successful,no cases converted to laparotomy,no postoperative complications.The operation time of group LESS and group LC were (110.2 ±29.3)min and (77.8 ±31.2)min,respectively,the differ-ence was ststictically significant (t=5.07,P<0.05).The intestinal recovery time and hospitalization time after oper-ation in group LESS were less than that in gruoup LC (P<0.05 ).The cosmetic effect in group LESS (3.5 ± 0.5)was higher than that in group LC(2.1 ±0.5)(P<0.05).Cor and C3 in group LESS were higher than those in group LC(P<0.05 ).Conclusion Laparoendoscopic single -site surgery in cholecystectomy is safe and feasible, compared with traditional laparoscopic operation,operation time in LESS is long,but arapid postoperative recovery, beauty effect is obvious.
