The Clinic Study on the Treatment of Maxillary Protrusion Malocclusion with Micro-Screw Palatal Implant Anchorage
10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2014.05.024
- VernacularTitle:腭侧微螺钉型种植体支抗治疗上颌前突的临床研究
- Author:
Xiaoying LI
;
Cheng PENG
;
Yi GUO
;
Weie SUN
;
Xiaoying CHEN
;
Dong WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
orthodontic anchorage procedures;
dental implants;
malocclusion,angle classⅡ;
microscrew implant
- From:
Tianjin Medical Journal
2014;(5):487-489
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinic application of micro-implant anchorage in the treatment of maxil-lary protrusion malocclusion. Methods Twenty-two patients,aged 18 to 25 years old,with maxillary protrusion were divid-ed into two groups:experimental group and control group with 11 patients in each group. All patients were treated with ex-traction. Micro-screw palatal implant was used in the cases of experimental group as orthodontic anchorage ,and traditional anchorage composed of extraoral arch used in the cases of control. The cephalometric films were measured before and after treatment. Statistical methods were utilized to analyze the morphological changes of facial profile and hard tissues in both groups. Results The values of U1-NA(mm:3.08±1.18 vs 8.15±3.05) and U1-SN(101.90°±3.50° vs 117.90°±6.05°) were sig-nificantly decreased after treatment compared with those before treatment in the experimental group ( P<0.01). The value of U1-L1(123.98°±5.78°vs 103.89°±8.95°) was significantly increased after treatment (P<0.01). In control group, the values of U1-NA (mm:5.01±1.34 vs 9.12±2.13) and U1-SN(101.90°±3.97° vs 114.87°±7.69°)were significantly decreased after treat-ment. The values of U1-L1(126.01°±3.12°vs 112.98°±5.98°) and U6-PtPNS(mm:21.45±2.43 vs 18.36±2.19)were significant-ly increased after treatment (P<0.05). The value of U1-L1(19.48°±8.90° vs 13.01°±5.90°) was significantly changed in exper-imental group than that of control group, but the value of U6-PtPNS(mm:0.90±0.29 vs 3.78±0.12)was significantly changed in control than that of experimental group (P<0.01). Conclusion The maxillary protrusion malocclusion with micro-im-plant anchorage can be used as treatment for patients with maxillary protrusion that needs strong anchorage.
