Speckle tracking echocardiographic assessment of global two-dimensional strain in patients with heart failure
- VernacularTitle:超声二维斑点追踪技术评价心力衰竭患者二维整体应变
- Author:
Qiushuang WANG
;
Hui ZHANG
;
Yu WANG
;
Beijie LUO
;
Dangsheng HUANG
;
Dongdong JI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Heart failure;
Echocardiography;
Strain
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
2010;26(3):500-503
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the characteristics of the two-dimensional global strain index in patients with different degrees heart failure with speckle tracking echocardiography. Methods Totally 35 myocardial infarction patients with heart failure and 28 healthy subjects (control group) were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into mild (n=14), moderate (n=13), and severe heart failure subgroup (n=8) according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The systolic longitudinal strain (LS), radial strain (RS) and circumferential strain (CS) were measured of left ventricular with two-dimensional speckle tracking technique. The average value of left ventricular 18 segmental LS, RS and CS was calculated as the global longitudinal strain (GLS), the global radial strain (GRS) and the global circumference strain (GCS), respectively. LVEF and left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were also measured with conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. The global two-dimensional strain and heart function between two groups were compared. The change of GLS, GRS and GCS of different heart failure and the relationship between them and LVEF were analyzed. Results Compared with control group, GLS, GRS and GCS reduced in heart failure groups (P<0.01). In heart failure groups, GLS significantly decreased with the decrease of LVEF, the difference of GLS was significant (P<0.05). GCS in severe heart failure subgroup was lower significantly than that in mild and moderate heart failure subgroups (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in GCS between mild and moderate heart failure subgroups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in GRS among heart failure subgroups (P>0.05). GLS was closely correlated to LVEF (r=-0.65, P<0.01), GCS was also correlated to LVEF (r=-0.55, P<0.01). Conclusion The changes of GLS, GRS and GCS is different in different degrees of heart failure. GLS is closely correlated to the change of LVEF. The change of GLS, GRS and GCS may reflect degrees of myocardial injury.
