Effectiveness and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2014.12.004
- VernacularTitle:伴心房颤动的急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓的疗效
- Author:
Shunyuan GUO
;
Bo CHEN
;
Zongjie SHI
;
Kenan CHEN
;
Yu GENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Acute ischemic stroke;
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator;
Atrial fibrillation;
Injections;
intravenous;
Thrombolytic therapy;
Cerebral hemorrhage;
Neurological function;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2014;23(12):1314-1318
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the effectiveness and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolysis therapy for acute ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods A total of 94 patients treated with intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis within 4.5 hours after cerebral stroke onset were analyzed and divided into two groups:a non-AF group (n =64) and an AF group (n =30).Another 30 acute ischemic stroke patients with AF without thrombolytic therapy were selected as a control group.The prognosis of the three groups was compared.The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used for comparison among the three groups before therapy and 7 days after therapy.The incidences of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (SICH) were recorded.The patients were followed up for 90 days and their clinical outcomes were assessed by using the modified Rankin scale (mRS).Results There were no significant differences in the NIHSS scores among three groups before treatment (P ＞ 0.05).The NIHSS scores were significantly lower in the AF and non-AF groups 7 days after thrombolysis therapy than those before thrombolysis therapy (P ＜0.05 and P ＜0.01),and no significant difference in the NIHSS scores was found in the control group before and after therapy (P ＞ 0.05).The incidence of ICH was significantly higher in the AF group than in the non-AF group (26.7％ vs.9.4％,P ＜ 0.05).No significant difference in the incidence of SICH was found between the AF and non-AF groups (13.3％ vs.6.3％,P ＞ 0.05).The favorable prognosis rate was higher in the AF and nonAFgroups than in control group (40.0％ vs.16.7％,P＜0.05; 45.3％ vs.16.7％,P＜0.01).No significant difference in very unfavorable prognosis rate was found between the AF and non-AF groups (20.0％ vs.18.8％,P ＞0.05).Conclusions It is effective and safe of rt-PA thrombolysis therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients with AF.
