The sickness impact and the quality of life in Grave's disease patients after treatment with 131I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2014.10.012
- VernacularTitle:Graves病患者131I治疗后疾病影响程度与生活质量变化
- Author:
Haisan ZHANG
;
Hongxing ZHANG
;
Baoping LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Grave's disease;
131I;
Mental health;
Quality of life
- From:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2014;23(10):904-908
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the sickness impact and the quality of life in patients who received 131 I treatment for Grave's disease with one year of follow-up.Methods 376 patients with Grave's disease(GD) who voluntarily received 131I treatment were recruited.The follow-up archives were established.The Sickness Impact and the Quality of life in patient' s with GD were measured using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP),Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS),Self-Rating Depression Scale(SAS) and Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) and Quality of life scale(QLS,SF-36) before and after treatment with 131I for 6 months and 12 months.Results 57 out of 376 cases were lost.319 cases finished follow-up studies.There was significant difference of SAS,SDS,SDSS,SIP and SF-36 and their agent score among three groups:before and 6months and 12months after 131I treatment in the 319 patients(F=8.561-1080.317,P＜0.001).After treatment with 131I,SAS,SDS,SDSS and SIP score were lower(P＜0.05),SF-36 total and agent score were higher(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the score of SAS,SDS,SDSS,SIP total score and it' s agent score of SD-Ⅱ,SR,W,SF-36 agent score of RP,BP,VT,SF at the end of 12 months compared to the score at the end of 6 months(P＞0.05).But there was significant difference between the score of SIP agent score of SD-Ⅰ,HM,RP,SF-36 total score and it' s agent score of PF,GH,RE,M H at the end of 12 months compared to the score at the end of 6 months (P＜0.05).At the end of 6 months and 12 months after treatment the subjects were divided five groups according to different clinical outcome.Not only at the end of 6 months,but also at the end of 12 months,there was significant difference of SAS,SDS,SDSS,SIP total score,and it' s agent score of SD-Ⅰ,SD-Ⅱ,SR,W,RP,SF-36 total score,and it's agent score PF,RP,BP,GH,VT,SF,RE,MH among the five groups(F6 =6.870-143.790,F12 =13.956-837.184,P＜0.001).There was no significant difference of HM among five groups (F6 =1.733,P6 =0.142; F12 =2.015,P12 =0.092).The score of SF-36 and its agent score PF,RP,VT,SF,RE,MH in three subgroup (healthy control,the patient group at end of 6 months and 12 months with normal thyroid function) was significant different,respectively(F=8.320-82.791,P＜0.001).There was no significant different for agent score of BP and GH(F=2.990,2.652,P=0.051,0.072).Conclusion Quality of life of patients with GD is decrease.131I treatment can improve it,but socialpsycho function can not be improved satisfactorily.It is necessary for GD patients to pay attention to the quality of life and provide effective mental intervention to improve the recovery completely.
