Clinical effect of lumbar catheter drainage combined with intrathecal injection on patients with cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2015.01.021
- VernacularTitle:腰大池置管外引流联合鞘内注射给药对脑脊液漏合并颅内感染治疗效果研究
- Author:
Pu LI
;
Zengsen WANG
;
Mingsheng LI
;
Hongchuan GUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar puncture and drainage;
Intrathecal administration;
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage;
Intracranial infection
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2015;31(1):66-69
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of lumbar catheter drainage combined with intrathecal injection on patients with cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection.Methods A retrospective study was conducted.One hundred and fifty-two cases with cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection were selected as our subjects who were hospitalized in the First Hospital of Yuncheng from 2006 to 2014.The patients were divided into lumbar puncture + intrathecal group (A),lumbar (group B) and lumbar intrathecal large pool + group (group C) based on post-processing methods.A experimental data were recorded and compared in terms of the total efficiency of treatment,the therapeutically effective time,bacterial clearance and security differences.Results After treatment,the levels of white blood cells,protein,glucose and intracranial pressure were changed compared with that of before treatment in three group(P ＜ 0.01),but there was no significant difference among the three groups(P ＞ 0.05).The therapy periods in group A,group B and group C were (12.80 ± 2.25) d,(12.64 ± 2.00) d and (9.44 ± 1.50) d respectively and the difference was significant(F =25.94,P ＜ 0.05).Compared with Group C,the therapy periods in group A and B were significant different(t =2.769,2.854;P ＜ 0.05),but there was no significant difference between group A and B (t =0.119,P =0.908).The cases with success.effect was 45 (89.1％) in group A,53 (94.6％) in group B,46 (95.8％) in group C,and there was no significant difference among three groups (P ＞ 0.05).In terms of bacterial clearance rate,33 cases(68.75％) was in group A,35 cases(72.91％) in group C and 23 cases (41.07％) in group B and the effective rate in group A or C were higher than that in group B (x2 =9.478,10.63 ; P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The methods of lumbar catheter drainage combinedwith intrathecal injection is proved with a high clinical value of therapy,effective treatment can effectively shorten the time and improve the overall treatment effect.
