A comparison of three different staging systems of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2015.03.001
- VernacularTitle:肝门部胆管癌不同分期方法的比较
- Author:
Liangjing ZHOU
;
Guoping DING
;
Liping CAO
;
Risheng QUE
;
Zhengrong WU
;
Guixing JIANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bile duct neoplasms;
Neoplasm staging;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2015;30(3):177-180
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the value among three hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC) staging systems,Bismuth-Corlette classification,TNM staging system and MSKCC classification,in predicting the resection rate and prognosis of HCC patients.Methods The clinical and histopathological data of 154 HCC cases were analyzed retrospectively.Three different staging methods were performed respectively to analyze the correlations with respectability and survival.Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied to find clinical and histopathological factors related to prognosis.Results There was no significant difference in resectability between Bismuth-Corlette classification or TNM stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ.The resection rates of MSKCC T1,T2 and T3 were 68.6％,44.8％,19.2％respectively (x2 =20.03,P =0.000).With higher T stage,resection rate obviously declined.The survival predicted by TNM staging and MSKCC classification was better than Bismuth-Corlette classification.Tumor differentiation,LN involvement,distant metastasis,margin status,TNM stage and MSKCC classification were significantly correlated with survival.Conclusions The MSKCC classification predicted resectability better than Bismuth-Corlette classification and TNM staging system,while both MSKCC classification and TNM staging system predicted survival better than Bismuth-Corlette classification.Clinical and histopathological factors such as tumor differentiation,LN involvement,metastasis,margin status,TNM staging,MSKCC classification were correlated with survival.
