Comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation in patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position supported by a Wilson frame
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2014.11.019
- VernacularTitle:Wilson框架固定俯卧位脊柱手术患者压力控制通气与容量控制通气效果的比较
- Author:
Congjie BI
;
Dan XIE
;
Donghai YU
;
Qiuping CAI
;
Xingguo LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Respiration,artificial;
Prone position;
Wilson frame
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2014;34(11):1354-1356
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in the patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position supported by a Wilson frame.Methods Forty patients,of ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,aged 30-64 yr,with body mass index ＜ 30 kg/m2,scheduled for elective spinal surgery in prone position supported by a Wilson frame under general anesthesia,were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation using either VCV (n =20) or PCV (n =20) mode.Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were performed after induction of anesthesia.The tidal volume (VT) was set at 10 ml/kg according to the ideal body weight in group VCV.The maximal inspiratory pressure of the anesthesia machine was adjusted to maintain the VT at 10 ml/kg in group P.Both ventilation modes were required to maintain PET CO2 within the normal range.VT,respiratory rate,minute ventilation (MV),dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn),peak and mean airway pressure (Ppeak,Pmean),mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR were recorded at 10 min after the patients were turned to supine position and at 30 min after the patients were turned to prone position after intubation.Arterial blood samples were collected for blood gas analysis,and oxygenation index(OI) and physiologic dead space fraction (VD/VT) were calculated.Results Compared with those at 10 min after turning to supine position,Ppeak was significantly increased and Cdyn,VT and MV were decreased at 30 min after turning to prone position in both groups.Compared with group VCV,Ppeak was significantly decreased,respiratory rate and Cdyn were increased,and no significant change was found in VT,MV,OI,VD/VT,Pmean,MAP and HR in PCV group.Conclusion Compared with VCV,PCV can improve the ventilatory efficacy and reduce the influence of prone position on respiratory dynamics in the patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position supported by a Wilson frame.
