Pedicle screw fixation through paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures：a follow-up of correction effect and biocompatibility
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.22.014
- VernacularTitle:椎弓根钉经椎旁肌间隙置入修复胸腰椎骨折：矫正效果及生物相容性随访
- Author:
Wei CUI
;
Yongpeng ZHANG
;
Bin ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2015;(22):3513-3518
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Different operation approaches can be selected during the repair of thoracolumbar fractures. Traditional posterior median approach wil cause great wound on patients, and easily induces some adverse consequences. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects and biocompatibility of conventional posterior median approach and paraspinal approach fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 53 cases of thoracolumbar fracture in the Shaanxi Province Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital from December 2012 to December 2013. They were divided into two groups according to approach method. The control group (n=27) received pedicle screw placement fixation through conventional posterior median approach. The observation group (n=26) underwent pedicle screw placement fixation through paraspinal muscle approach. After repair, they were folowed up for 12 months. Imaging results, pain score and perioperative relevant indexes were observed and compared in both groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Imaging examination was conducted before repair, immediately after repair and during final folow-up in both groups. The height of vertebral anterior border and kyphosis correction effect were good after different therapies in both group, but no significant difference was detectable between the two groups (al P > 0.05). These findings suggest that height of vertebral anterior border and kyphosis correction effect were identical between the two groups. Pain visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 24 hours and 3 days after repair and during final folow-up (al P < 0.05). Perioperative relevant indexes were analyzed in both groups. Intraoperative bleeding amount, drainage and bed time after repair were observed in the observation group, which showed significant advantages as compared with the control group (al P < 0.05). These results confirmed that compared with the traditional posterior median approach surgery, minimaly invasive pedicle screw placement through paraspinal muscle approach for thoracolumbar fractures can obtain better repair effects and biocompatibility.
