A comparative study on three endoscopic methods for removal of common bile duct stones accompa-nied with periampullary diverticula
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2015.05.005
- VernacularTitle:合并壶腹周围憩室胆总管结石的三种不同内镜治疗方法的对比研究
- Author:
Yang WANG
;
Liping YE
;
Minhua LIN
;
Xinli MAO
;
Xianbin ZHOU
;
Bili HE
;
Xiancang SHENG
;
Jinshun ZHANG
;
Yu ZHANG
;
Dinghai LUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cholangiopancreatography,endoscopic retrograde;
Periampullary Diverticula;
Common bile duct stones;
Balboon dilatation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2015;(5):290-295
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of three endoscopic methods for re-moval of common bile duct stones (CBDs)accompanied with periampullary diverticula(PAD).Methods A total of 154 patients hospitalized at Taizhou Hospital and Taizhou No.1 People′s Hospital of Zhejiang prov-ince from December 2012 to July 2013 were divided randomly into three groups,i.e.,EST,EPBD and ES-BD group,and received the treatment of EST,EPBD and limited EST plus EPBD (ESBD)to extract CBDs, respectively.After 12 months of follow-up,the rate of full stone clearance,stones clearance rate in one time,the rate of mechanical lithotripsy,the rate of urgent lithotripsy,the average procedures,the average removal time and the complication incidence among three groups were compared.Results The rates of stone clearance in one time in group ESBD was higher than those of group EST and group EPBD (94.12% VS 78.43%,73.08%;P <0.05)with significant difference.The average procedures in group ESBD was lower than that of group EPBD (1.08 VS 1.31,P <0.05),which also showed significant difference.The occur-rence rates of early complication in group ESBD was lower than that of group EPBD (15.69% VS 34.61%, P <0.05).The occurrence rates of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia in group ESBD was lower than that of group EPBD (5.88% VS 21.15%)with significant difference (P <0.05).The incidence of pneumobilia in group EST was higher than those of group EPBD (52.27% VS 26.19%,P =0.013)and group ESBD (52.27%VS 27.66%,P =0.016).Conclusion The stone extraction efficiency of ESBD is better than that of EST and EPBD.Compared with conventional EST,ESBD shows similar safety level,and is safer than EPBD.So ESBD is a safe and effective method to remove CBDs with PAD.
