The clinical effect of the peripheral balloon closure compared with surgical intervention for developed retroperitoneal hematoma caused by femoral artery perforation in PCI
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2015.16.014
- VernacularTitle:外周球囊封堵术处理介入术中股动脉穿孔致腹膜后血肿的临床效果
- Author:
Songjian HE
;
Ning TAN
;
Jianfang LUO
;
Hualong LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
percutaneous coronary intervention;
fenmoral artery perforation;
retroperitoneal hematom;
risk factors;
major ad-verse cardiovascular events
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2015;(16):2200-2202
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of the peripheral balloon closure with surgical intervention for developed retroperitoneal hematoma(RPH) caused by femoral artery perforation .Methods A retrospecive analysis was performed on 2 492 consecutive patients underwent PCI from January 2005 to December 2013 in Guangdong people′s hospital .Twenty -four cases of developed RPH caused by femoral artery puncture operation for PCI were retrospectively analyzed ,13 cases of patients who took peripheral balloon closure were divided into balloon block group and the other 11 patients adopted surgery vascular repair process‐ing ,were enrolled in the surgical treatment group .Comparison was done among the hemostatic effect and the time ,and postoperative adverse events ,including lower limb blood supply obstacles for puncture side postoperative ,major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization ,all‐cause mortality ;Multivariate logistic regression was used to assesse the RPH risk factors .Re‐sults The incidence of RPH caused by femoral artery perforation was about 0 .96% .During coronary intervention ,the following variables were found to be independent predictors of RPH caused by femoral artery perforation:female gender(OR=8 .94 ,95% CI:3 .75-21 .98 ,P< 0 .01) ,femoral artery ulcer(OR= 6 .43 ,P<0 .05) and multiple puncture (> 3 times) (OR= 7 .39 ,95% CI:2 .74-13 .76 ,P<0 .01) .Hemostatic success rates of the two groups were all 100% ;the average times of processing perforation were (76 .8 ± 34 .6) min and ((88 .5 ± 37 .3) min ,P<0 .05 ,the difference was statistically significant ;3 cases (23 .1% ) and 2 cases (18 .2% ) developed into postoperative severe anemia (Hgb<60 g/L) in each group ,P>0 .05;Each group had 1 case for in‐hospital MACE (7 .7% vs .9 .1 % ,P>0 .05);In the two groups ,there was no lower limb blood supply obstacles and death case .Conclusion For progress RPH caused by femoral artery perforation ,peripheral balloon closure can be a faster ,better sealing hemostatic ,and shorten the rescue time ,and the success rate is high ,and there is less postoperative adverse events .The safety and effectiveness be‐have good .
