Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis with a Second-Generation US Contrast Medium in a Rat Breast Tumor Model.
- Author:
Eun Young KO
1
;
Sang Hoon LEE
;
Hak Hee KIM
;
Sung Moon KIM
;
Myung Jin SHIN
;
Namkug KIM
;
Gyungyub GONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Breast, US; Contrast media; Experimental study
- MeSH: Animals; Contrast Media; Ethylnitrosourea; Female; Hemodynamics; Image Enhancement; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/chemically induced/pathology/*ultrasonography; Neovascularization, Pathologic/*ultrasonography; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2008;9(3):243-249
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Tumor angiogenesis is an important factor for tumor growth, treatment response and prognosis. Noninvasive imaging methods for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis have been studied, but a method for the quantification of tumor angiogenesis has not been established. This study was designed to evaluate tumor angiogenesis in a rat breast tumor model by the use of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) examination with a second-generation US contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The alkylating agent 19N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) was injected into the intraperitoneal cavity of 30-day-old female Sprague-Dawley rats. Three to four months later, breast tumors were detected along the mammary lines of the rats. A total of 17 breast tumors larger than 1 cm in nine rats were evaluated by gray-scale US, color Doppler US and contrast-enhanced US using SonoVue. The results were recorded as digital video images; time-intensity curves and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed. Pathological breast tumor specimens were obtained just after the US examinations. The tumor specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) and the expression of CD31, an endothelial cell marker, was determined by immunohistochemical staining. We also evaluated the pathological diagnosis of the tumors and the microvessel density (MVD). Spearman's correlation and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The pathological diagnoses were 11 invasive ductal carcinomas and six benign intraductal epithelial proliferations. The MVD did not correlate with the pathological diagnosis. However, blood volume (BV) showed a statistically significant correlation with MVD (Spearman's correlation, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US using a second-generation US contrast material was useful for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast tumors in the rat.
