Preliminary application of hand robot assisted rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function in patients with stroke and hemiplegia
11.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2015.06.006
- VernacularTitle:机器手辅助卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能康复的初步应用
- Author:
Lin LIU
;
Lin ZHU
;
Guixiang SHAN
;
Shuyu YAN
;
Lei CAO
;
Xiuzhen LIU
;
Weiqun SONG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Hemiplegia;
Rehabilitation;
Recoveryofupperlimbfunction;
Robotics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2015;(6):306-310
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Toinvestigatetheeffectofrehabilitationrobothandontheupperlimbmotor functioninpatientswithstrokeandhemiplegia.Methods Theeffectsoftraditionalrehabilitation therapy or robot rehabilitation treatment of 15 stroke patients with hemiplegia were analyzed retrospectively. There were 4 females and 11 males. According to the group order,they were divided into either a robot rehabilitation group (n=8 )or a general rehabilitation group (n =7 ). The patients of the general rehabilitation group received general rehabilitation training at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine for 4 weeks,3 times a week,and 30 min for each time. At the same time,they also conducted family rehabilitation training,5 times a week,once for 1 h;the patients of the robot rehabilitation group received the general rehabilitation training for the same length of time as the general rehabilitation group,and they also performed robot rehabilitation training,5 times a week,once for 1 h. The patients of both groups were evaluated with the modified Ashworth scale (MAS )scores,Fugl-Meyer motor assessment of the upper extremity(FMA-UE),andWolfmotorfunctiontest(WMFT)beforeandaftertreatment.Results Compared with before training,the MAS score of the robot rehabilitation group was decreased significantly after four weeks of training. The time in WMFT was shortened significantly and the function score was improved obviously. The scores of upper extremity,hand score,and total FMA score in FMA-UE were improved significantly,and there were significant differences (all P <0. 05 ),while there were no significant differences in various indicators in the general rehabilitation group (all P>0. 05). Comparing the effects after four weeks of rehabilitation in both groups,the robot rehabilitation group was superior to the general rehabilitationgroupforthehandscoreinFMA-UE(allP<0.05).Conclusion Therehabilitation robot hand effectively lowered the upper limb spasticity. It has significant effect for recovery motor function of hand;however,it did not have a significant effect for motor rehabilitation on wrist.
