Application of fine needle single-step centesis in percutaneous endoscopic nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi
10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2015.07.012
- VernacularTitle:细针一步穿刺法在经皮肾镜治疗鹿角型肾结石中的应用
- Author:
Guangsen CHENG
;
Xiubin PENG
;
Jiayuan CHEN
;
Qun XIE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
fine needle centesis;
percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
renal staghorn calculus
- From:Journal of Interventional Radiology
2015;(7):608-611
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the safety and clinical effect of fine needle single-step centesis in percutaneous endoscopic nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi. Methods Percutaneous endoscopic nephrolithotomy with fine needle single-step centesis was employed in 75 patients (single-step group) with renal staghorn calculi, and percutaneous endoscopic nephrolithotomy with two-step centesis was adopted in other 75 patients with renal staghorn calculi (two-step group). The clinical effect and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The placement of drainage catheter was successfully accomplished in all 150 patients. In single-step group the operation time was 18-45 minutes with a mean of 36 minutes; the mean blood loss during the procedure was about 5 ml. After the treatment, massive bleeding occurred in 3 cases that needed blood transfusion, and residual stone was observed in 6 cases. In two-step group the operation time was 16-42 minutes with a mean of 34 minutes; the mean blood loss during the procedure was about 7 ml. After the treatment, massive bleeding occurred in 7 cases that needed blood transfusion; one of them had renal pseudoaneurysm and the bleeding was stopped after renal artery embolization treatment; and residual stone was observed in 7 cases. No procedure-related perirenal organ injury was seen in single-step group, while in two-step group pneumothorax (n=1) and injury of splenic flexure of colon (n=1)were found. Conclusion In performing percutaneous endoscopic nephrolithotomy, fine needle single-step centesis is more safe and effective than conventional two-step centesis.
