Effects of different anesthetic solutions on postoperative cognitive function and S100β protein
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2015.04.016
- VernacularTitle:不同麻醉方案对术后认知功能及S100β蛋白的影响
- Author:
Long ZHAN
;
Jiange HAN
;
Wenqian ZHAI
;
Jiapeng LIU
;
Jianxu ER
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Anesthesia scheme;
Propofol;
Hemodynamics;
Cognitive function;
S100β protein
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
2015;(4):398-401
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effects of different anesthetic solutions on postoperative cognitive function and serum S100β protein levels.Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ninety patients necessary to perform off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (op-CABG) in Tianjin Chest Hospital from November 2013 to July 2014 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups by random number table: P1, P2 and P3 groups, 30 cases in each group. The anesthesia was maintained with propofol by target-controlled infusion (TCI) in all the patients in the three groups, and the respective dosages were < 2.0μg/mL, 2.0 - 3.0μg/mL and > 3.0 - 4.0μg/mL. The operation time, anesthesia time, dosages of propofol and the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) were compared among the three groups. At the following times: before induction of anesthesia (T0), completion of anesthesia induction (T1), after tracheal intubation (T2), skin incision (T3), 1 hour after operation (T4), 2 hours after operation (T5) and the end of operation (T6), the narcotrend index (NTI) and hemodynamic levels were observed; the serum S100β protein levels were measured at the following times: before induction of anesthesia (Ta), 2 hours after operation (Tb), the end of operation (Tc), postoperative 6 hours (Td) and postoperative 24 hours (Te).Results There were no significant differences in operation times and anesthesia times among three groups (allP > 0.05); dosages of propofol in P2 and P3 groups were obviously higher than those of P1 group (mg: 1 746.3±43.9, 2 332.7±42.8 vs. 968.5±35.6, bothP < 0.05), and the incidences of POCD in P2 and P3 groups were lower than that in P1 group (10.00%, 6.67% vs. 33.33%, bothP < 0.05). With the extension of anesthesia time, the level of NTI was gradually declined in each group, in P3 group, it was occasionally increased at T6, and beginning from time point T1 afterwards, the NTI levels were lower than those of P1 and P2 groups at all the time points (allP < 0.05); the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the three groups had a tendency of firstly going down and then increasing, and the inflection point being at T2, in P1 group, the elevation of MAP level persisted to T4, and it began to decline at T5, while in P2 and P3 groups, the levels started to decline at T4; the heart rate (HR) in three groups showed a tendency of firstly going up and then declining, and the inflection point being at T3; until T6, in P3 group, MAP and HR were all lower than those of P1 and P2 groups, the differences being statistically significant [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 74.9±8.3 vs. 85.3±11.2, 84.2±10.1;HR (bpm): 74.1±4.2 vs. 80.9±8.1, 78.7±7.9, allP < 0.05]. The serum S100β protein levels of three groups at Tb began to be obviously higher than those at Ta, and reached the peak points at Tc, then the levels started to decline until Td, and the levels at Te was approximately close to those of Ta, but the serum S100β protein levels in P2 and P3 groups were lower than that in P1 group, the differences being statistically significant (mg/L: 1.05±0.22, 1.04±0.21 vs. 1.33±0.22, bothP < 0.05).Conclusion Application of propofol by TCI 2.0 - 3.0μg/mL for maintenance of anesthesia can achieve the satisfactory depth of anesthesia, and it not only can reduce the effects on hemodynamics, but also can decrease the serum S100β protein level and the incidence of POCD.
